> anyway, the other way is I found it's helpful when prompting LLMs to use the same "it's not delivery, it's DiGiorno's" pattern that they're all so obsessed with. especially when the thing's misapprehended some concept, so you need to clarify
1. Dying laughing at “ it's not delivery, it's DiGiorno's"
2. They do it because it’s succinct, and unambiguous.
We should be the last community (technical documentation, engineers) complaining about careful planning and precision behind synthesis of textual communication.
1. Dying laughing at “ it's not delivery, it's DiGiorno's"
2. They do it because it’s succinct, and unambiguous.